• Opinions

RealityCheck: Is your brief setting you up for success?

You wouldn’t start building a house without agreeing the plans and laying solid foundations. Yet that’s effectively what happens with many briefs.

The 2026 JFDI / Opini­um New Busi­ness Barom­e­ter found that only half of ideas devel­oped in suc­cess­ful pitch­es are ever exe­cut­ed. That’s not because agen­cies mis­un­der­stood the brief. It’s because the brief wasn’t right to begin with.

If the organ­i­sa­tion hasn’t agreed what prob­lem it’s solv­ing, how bold it’s pre­pared to be, what suc­cess looks like, and what it is will­ing to risk, then the work that fol­lows is on shaky ground.

These deci­sions have to come first. No pre­sen­ta­tion – no mat­ter how pol­ished or excit­ing – can replace that.

It’s nor­mal for dif­fer­ent pri­or­i­ties to sit around the table. But if those pri­or­i­ties aren’t aligned before the brief is writ­ten, the work that fol­lows will always feel exposed. And work with­out clear back­ing gets cut.

Why invest­ment gets pulled

A reduced bud­get is rarely a pure finan­cial issue. Invest­ment is scaled back when con­fi­dence drops, and that doubt is usu­al­ly about the brief, not the agency.

In many organ­i­sa­tions, the lead­er­ship team was not ful­ly aligned from the start, even if the brief looked clear. One per­son wants bold change. Anoth­er wants to man­age risk. Anoth­er wants cost con­trol. The brief becomes a com­pro­mise. It reads well, but the com­mit­ment was nev­er real­ly there to begin with.

When the num­bers tight­en, mar­gins come under pres­sure, or lead­er­ship atten­tion shifts else­where, the work comes under scruti­ny and the scope nar­rows. The most ambi­tious ideas are scaled back, not because they aren’t good, but because they require con­vic­tion at the moment con­vic­tion is being tested.

Why this keeps happening

In most organ­i­sa­tions, launch­ing a pitch feels like progress because it keeps things moving.

The hard­er part is get­ting every­one in a room and agree­ing the trade-offs, the risks, and what the busi­ness is actu­al­ly pre­pared to com­mit to.

For the per­son lead­ing it inter­nal­ly, that means sur­fac­ing dis­agree­ment, push­ing col­leagues to take a clear posi­tion, and ask­ing for com­mit­ment before there is any­thing tan­gi­ble to point to.

It can feel safer to invite ideas first and sort the align­ment out lat­er. It’s eas­i­er to say, ​“Let’s see what comes back.” But with­out that clar­i­ty, even the best ideas strug­gle once they’re challenged.

When pres­sure increas­es, the ideas that ask the most of the organ­i­sa­tion are usu­al­ly the first to be scaled back.

It comes down to tim­ing. When align­ment comes after the pitch instead of before it, the work is always on unsta­ble ground.

The hidden cost

When work stalls, the dam­age goes beyond wast­ed fees.

Wast­ed time: weeks of meet­ings, decks, iter­a­tions and approvals.

Wast­ed spend: work pro­duced but nev­er used, or dilut­ed until it can no longer perform.

Wast­ed momen­tum: inter­nal teams lose con­fi­dence and deci­sion mak­ing slows.

Com­mer­cial risk: the organ­i­sa­tion pays for activ­i­ty that doesn’t deliv­er impact.

The simple fix

The solu­tion is not more cre­ative options.
It’s inter­nal clar­i­ty and align­ment on five fundamentals:

1. The real prob­lem
Not the symp­toms, the under­ly­ing com­mer­cial or organ­i­sa­tion­al issue that gen­uine­ly needs solving.

2. The lev­el of ambi­tion
Are you aim­ing for incre­men­tal improve­ment, or a mean­ing­ful shift that will require real change and risk tolerance?

3. The invest­ment you are gen­uine­ly pre­pared to pro­tect
Not the opti­mistic fig­ure but the bud­get, time, and lead­er­ship atten­tion you would defend when the pres­sure increases.

4. The capa­bil­i­ty and capac­i­ty to deliv­er
Do you have the skills and head­room to exe­cute this prop­er­ly, or are you expect­ing trans­for­ma­tion from a stretched team?

5. The def­i­n­i­tion of suc­cess
What would have to be true com­mer­cial­ly, cul­tur­al­ly or com­pet­i­tive­ly for every­one around the table to say it was worth it?

When that clar­i­ty exists, approval becomes eas­i­er, deliv­ery becomes faster, and invest­ment holds. Strong ideas don’t need defend­ing when lead­er­ship is already aligned behind the brief. If lead­er­ship isn’t, you’re ask­ing the pitch to do work the organ­i­sa­tion hasn’t done yet.

Why we start with RealityCheck

At ODA, we don’t treat the pitch as the place to find align­ment. We treat align­ment as the con­di­tion for work to begin.

Real­i­ty­Check is a focused lead­er­ship align­ment inter­ven­tion designed to sur­face the dif­fi­cult ques­tions before sig­nif­i­cant invest­ment is committed.

In prac­tice, that means:
- Con­fi­den­tial one-to-one con­ver­sa­tions with key deci­sion makers

- A fast review of rel­e­vant con­text, so we under­stand what is already assumed to be true

- A facil­i­tat­ed ses­sion that sur­faces the ten­sions clear­ly and constructively

- A rewrit­ten brief that func­tions as a deci­sion document

Real­i­ty­Check isn’t about slow­ing momen­tum. It’s about mak­ing sure you aren’t mov­ing quick­ly in the wrong direction.

This is the val­ue of a clear brief. When lead­er­ship aligns, cre­ativ­i­ty becomes eas­i­er to approve, eas­i­er to defend, and far more like­ly to reach the market.

About to run a pitch?

If you’re a CMO, CCO or Mar­ket­ing Direc­tor with a brand chal­lenge on your desk, you don’t need more options. You need confidence.

- Con­fi­dence that you are solv­ing the right problem.

- Con­fi­dence that the organ­i­sa­tion is aligned enough to execute.

- Con­fi­dence that the invest­ment will trans­late into com­mer­cial impact.

That is what Real­i­ty­Check is built for.

If you’d like to explore whether a Real­i­ty­Check could help pro­tect your invest­ment, get in touch.

Back To Latest